This is a good practice. It turns what could be a lesser-version of [[Wikipedia]], where links are just "related" into a semantic _why_ they are related via _how_ they are used. The link up there to Wikipedia suggests "there's a note having to do with Wikipedia", meanwhile a note that is able to [[Use Full Sentence Note Titles to Crystalize Thought]] becomes **immediately** clear with what that notes relationship is to this one. This still allows you to grow, develop, and build on **ideas**, but doesn't relegate them to simple _topics_. This quite literally grows the intersection between crossing trains of thought. > [!tip] Notes that contain **ideas** are best fully expressed, notes that only talk about a topic are best left terse. **Side benefit:** this is the ultimate form of [[Distillation]]. You don't have to express the idea perfectly right out the gate, they can be added to/refined as a part of [[Progressive Summarization]]. **** # More ## Source - [[Andy Matuschak]] ## Related - [[Notes (index)]] - [[Andy Matuschak]]