The crème de la crème of standards management groups is [[ISO]], but I commonly run across a couple of other groups, too. If a group is included in this note, it's safe to say they are influential.
## ISO
See [this pre-existing note for ISO](ISO).
## Object Management Group (OMG)
The **Object Management Group** is a standards-creation group responsible for creating & maintaining:
- [[SysML]]
- [[UAF]]
- [[BPMN]]
- and more
Their standards are, from my perspective, overly verbose and descriptive. It seems that, across the board, they err on the side of "*when in doubt, keep it in*".
## The Open Group
**The Open Group** is a standards-creation group responsible for the creation and maintenance of:
- UNIX
- [[TOGAF]]
- [[Archimate]]
- and more
Their standards I find more reasonable in terms of depth & complexity.
****
# More
## Source
- https://www.opengroup.org/what-we-do-technology-standards